On October 30th, the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC), the Fed’s policy-making group, announced a 25 basis point (bp) decline (-0.25%) in the Fed Funds rate, to a new trading range of 1.50-1.75%. This is the second follow-on rate cut since July, with the Fed adopting 25 bp rate cuts at each of its FOMC meetings since July 30. The cumulative 75 bp reduction in the Fed Funds rate brings the effective rate target down to 1.63% from the cycle peak of 2.38% put in place last December. Notably, the Fed Funds rate is now 14 bp below the Fed’s inflation barometer, the core Personal Consumption Expenditure (PCE) deflator, ex food and energy, which had a year-over-year growth rate of 1.77% through August, running under the Fed’s 2.0% target.
Fed Chairman Powell was initially coy about the prospects for future rate cuts at the previous two post-FOMC press briefings, describing the cuts as a “mid-course correction” and avoiding any and all suggestion that the Fed was embarking on a cyclical and prolonged reversal in monetary policy. Nevertheless, the short-term fixed income and money markets have discounted a cumulative 1.0% decline in the Funds rate since June. The pattern recently has been that Powell and other Fed Governors would make comments in the weeks leading up to an FOMC meeting which validated market expectations of a coming rate cut. Powell was vague in describing prospective policy today, and after three consecutive cuts the Fed may well pause to assess the impact on the economy. However, we note that the June 2020 Fed Funds futures contract is priced at 1.38%, essentially projecting a 100% probability of that outcome. We have written previously that the Fed’s best monetary policy is one that takes its cues from the interest rate markets, and we expect the Fed will continue to follow the markets’ lead, although the cadence of rate cuts may slow in the months ahead.
The context for the Fed’s rate cuts is that global economic activity has slowed sharply this year, mainly due to uncertainty caused by the U.S. trade disputes with China and the tariffs that result from them. Manufacturing conditions are especially weak in Germany, whose capital goods trade surplus with China has shrunk precipitously as capital investment planning stalled across the developed world. The European Central Bank has reinstituted quantitative easing (QE) policy and dropped its already negative policy rate lower to -0.50%. QE policies in Europe and Japan are again pulling global interest rates lower, much as in 2015-16. The Fed is following global rates lower and is pretty much in sync. The Dollar has wobbled a little lately but remains on the rich side, suggesting the Fed hasn’t overdone the easing. The conundrum for global monetary policymakers is whether marginal cuts to already low short-term borrowing costs are significant enough to stimulate economic activity in the face of stiff global headwinds from slowing trade and supply chain uncertainty.
The immediate challenge for the Fed is that U.S. growth appears to be downshifting further this fall. So far, the slowing U.S. economy has remained fairly resilient with the unemployment rate at the cycle low of 3.5%. Consumer confidence appears to be faltering some from high levels, household spending shows signs of taking a breather, U.S. manufacturing has struggled under the strong Dollar, and lately the heretofore steady growth in payrolls has slowed to what could be called stall speed levels. We estimate that payrolls increasing about 130,000 per month is enough to keep up with population growth, meaning opportunity for younger new entrants to the labor force. As payroll growth slows below that level, the unemployment rate drifts upward. The Labor Department reports on October job growth on Friday and the markets will be paying close attention. September growth in non-farm payrolls was 136,000, including temporary census hiring. Private non-farm payroll growth was a mere 114,000. Growth in October below the 130,000 threshold will be seen as an important macroeconomic warning signal.
With the Fed Funds rate at 1.63% and the core PCE inflation rate at 1.77% over the last 12 months, a serviceable proxy for short-term inflation expectations, the Funds rate is 14 bp below the inflation rate; meaning the real, inflation-adjusted Funds rate is marginally negative at -0.14%. The real Funds rate has ranged in recent years from -2.0% at the depths in the QE era to 1.0% earlier this year. Our examination of the real Funds rate is a part of our effort to handicap the theoretical equilibrium Funds rate, for which the real Funds rate often serves as a proxy. A lot of discussion and study emanating from the Fed in recent years pointed to the equilibrium Funds rate being around 1.0% in the last year or so. Fed studies also indicated that the equilibrium Funds rate behaves cyclically, meaning it rises and falls some along with economic momentum. Thus it is a moving target, and our assessment is that Fed policy is geared to position the Funds rate either above or below the equilibrium rate, depending on the policy preference; i.e., tighter or easier, respectively. The equilibrium Funds rate is probably closer to 0% than 1% today, given the global slowdown that has occurred this year. Consequently, our view is that the Fed has not eased policy much more than to move the Funds rate down concurrent with the downward drift in the equilibrium rate. If U.S. economic growth slows further this fall, as appears to be the developing case, the Fed is likely to pursue a more intensely stimulative monetary policy, on the order of cutting the Funds rate a full 1.0% below the core inflation rate, to the vicinity of a 0.75% Funds rate.
A resolution in the trade war would be a game changer that could improve the economic outlook and relieve the Fed of the need to cut rates further. A narrow deal appears to be in the works for the sides to agree to, referred to as Phase One in a multi-phase process. Presidents Trump and Xi will meet in Chile in mid-November and the signals from Washington are that they are expected to sign the agreement then. Our current read is that the essential elements of the deal will include the American side cutting or deferring some tariffs in exchange for sizable Chinese purchases of U.S. agricultural products. The important U.S. complaints relating to intellectual property protections, forced technology transfers and other unfair trading practices are relegated to later phases, most likely after the U.S. elections next fall. Our expectation is that President Trump is unlikely to completely eliminate the current tariffs, or promise not to escalate further next year, in the absence of any movement on the U.S. priorities. Thus, it does not appear likely at this point that the Phase One deal will significantly remove the brake on the global economy.
All data sourced to Bloomberg Finance, L.P., and the Federal Reserve Board
The information, views, opinions, and positions expressed by the author(s), presenter(s) and/or presented in the article are those of the author or individual who made the statement and do not necessarily reflect the policies, views, opinions, and positions of Hancock Whitney Bank. Hancock Whitney makes no representations as to the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, suitability, or validity of any information presented.
This information is general in nature and is provided for educational purposes only. Information provided and statements made should not be relied on or interpreted as accounting, financial planning, investment, legal, or tax advice. Hancock Whitney Bank encourages you to consult a professional for advice applicable to your specific situation.
Investment products and services, such as brokerage, advisory accounts, annuities, and insurance are offered through Hancock Whitney Investment Services, Inc., a registered broker/dealer, member FINRA/SIPC and an SEC-Registered Investment Advisor.
Hancock Whitney Bank offers other investment products, which may include asset management accounts as part of its Wealth Management Services. Hancock Whitney Bank and Hancock Whitney Investment Services Inc. are both wholly owned subsidiaries of Hancock Whitney Corporation.
Investment and Insurance Products:
|NO BANK GUARANTEE||NOT A DEPOSIT||MAY LOSE VALUE||NOT FDIC INSURED|
|NOT INSURED BY ANY FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AGENCY|